From our March 19, 2018 Facebook Post:
📺 The following clip is from a recent ACIP meeting where they voted to approve a new Hepatitis B vaccine. This vaccine contains a new adjuvant (substance intended to stimulate an immune response) – Cytosine phosphoguanine (CpG) 1018 – that is not used in any other vaccine licensed for use in the US.
⚠️Summary:
—–
Q: Is it safe to use vaccines containing other adjuvants along with the new vaccine?
A: We don’t know. We didn’t study it. But our “general approach to immunizations” is that it’s fine. #science
—–
Q: Do we have any safety data from other countries that are already using vaccines containing this adjuvant?
A: Nah.
—-
Great! Let’s vote! *Vaccine is approved unanimously* Hooray! Thanks, everyone!
—-
ACIP member with sudden attack of conscience: Even though I just voted to give this vaccine to every US adult over the age of 18, I am concerned about the risk of heart attack associated with the use of this vaccine.
ACIP member with sudden attack of conscience #2: So…how soon will we know if the people we just voted to give this vaccine to are dropping dead of heart attacks?
FDA: Two years. We also think there may be a risk of autoimmune diseases and shingles, and we’re also going to give it to pregnant women in the general population to see how that goes.
—-
In conclusion:
☠️ Inadequate safety data.
☠️ Heavy reliance on post-marketing surveillance – we all know how that song and dance goes (“You can’t prove the vaccine caused that. Anyone can report anything the VAERS.”).
🤷♂️ I wonder if the “general population” receiving this new vaccine will be made aware of the reservations held by the very people that approved its use? Will your doctor tell you, “Oh, by the way, there is concerning evidence about heart attacks and autoimmune diseases, but we don’t really know a whole lot about it, so let me know if either of those things happen to you, mm kay?”
#tfvc
#informedconsent
#parentscalltheshots
#thechoiceshouldbeyours
What is the purpose of administering a Hepatitis B vaccine to the child of a mother who is Hepatitis B surface antigen negative who is low risk? The child won’t be sexually active or an IV drug abuser for over a decade, at which time the immunity will have waned and the child will need another expense$$$$$ vaccine!! This is all about MONEY!!
You have no data to make a recommendation but you approve it anyway for millions of children??? Are you NUTS? Pre-clinical trials were not done using the adjuvented vaccines simultaneously, yet you want to use or children as guinea pigs? ARE YOU NUTS? You have done no studies to prove that giving multiple adjuvented vaccines in different limbs is safe!!! But your “GENERAL APPROACH to immunizations is that they can be given at the same time? In different limbs? ARE YOU NUTS? You have not done safety studies to prove that giving multiple adjuvented vaccines simultaneously is safe, but you are willing to put our children’s lives at risk by not doing safety studies based on conjecture? ARE YOU NUTS?? Multiple adjuvented vaccines are not given in Europe or any other country in the world, but you want to give it to our children? Are YOU NUTS?…..and you wonder why the US has the highest infant mortality rate in the industrialized world? This group of assholes just put the lives of our children at risk and they’re celebrating!!!
There is only 1 reason I can think of for why they have mandated this vax for our kids and that is to prevent Hep b from spreading thru all of the young sex trafficked kids and to protect the ppl who buy them or pay for sexual acts with them from Hep b. I don’t see another reason, it’s just heartbreaking.