Search
Close this search box.

Jordan Peterson Schools Livestreamer on COVID Policy

In a viral interview with Steven Bonnell II, also known as Destiny, an online video game live streamer who frequently incorporates political commentary into his channel, Jordan Peterson debates Bonnell on the definition of vaccines, their efficacy, and the effects of COVID-19 lockdowns.

In the middle of their two-hour conversation, Destiny remarked that “none of the conservative fear-mongering came true,” asserting that conservatives had warned people they would die if they took the vaccine. Jordan Peterson countered this by criticizing the healthcare system for administering a vaccine to millions without fully understanding the side effects, claiming it caused an increase in myocarditis among young men.

Destiny defended his position by arguing that the vaccine reduced the virus’s death and transmission rates. Peterson responded by pointing out that the Destiny’s statistics were inherently flawed since the Canadian government restricted unvaccinated individuals from traveling for six months due to fears of COVID-19’s spread.

The highlight of the conversation was a heated exchange about vaccine mandates. Destiny argued that governments and organizations worldwide have promoted vaccine mandates for the greater good of public health. Peterson quickly refuted this, asserting that vaccines should never be mandated.

The discussion then shifted to the profits of big pharmaceutical companies from increased vaccination. Peterson noted that children today receive nearly 80 vaccines, compared to far fewer a decade ago.

Conversations like these expose underlying beliefs and policies that influence public health decisions. Jordan Peterson’s debate with Destiny exemplifies the ongoing and contentious conversation about forced vaccination and reflects broader ideological divides. By challenging the rationale behind vaccine mandates, revealing statistical bias, and highlighting potential overreach, Peterson lifts the veil on what the left truly thinks about forced health measures. These discussions are essential for fostering transparency and ensuring that public health policies are debated openly and fairly, allowing individuals to make informed decisions about their health.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top