Covid 19 Vaccine Resources and Information
We will add to this list often (newest additions will be at the top), so check back regularly. You can click the title of each article to share on social media. As always, we stand with you ready to protect and advance informed consent, medical privacy, and vaccine choice.
News You Can Use
Find news you can use to make an informed choice about the C0VID-19 vaccine! Updated regularly, so check back often! Newest articles will be at the top.
Prophetic words from June 2020: “Dr. Robert Gallo, co-founder and international scientific adviser of the Global Virus Network and one of the world’s leading virologists — he is the co-discoverer of HIV and the developer of the HIV blood test, among other things — worries that the unique characteristics of Covid-19 will make it hard for any traditional vaccine to have 'durability.'
'You look at the structure of the proteins, and it’s a lot like HIV, because of its glycan shields,' he says, referring to sugars that protect viruses from antibodies. 'Antibodies that are glycosylated in this way do not last.' Because of this, Gallo says, he worries that companies might be tempted to declare victory prematurely.”
Ladies and Gentlemen, the manufacturer of a current EUA vaccine:
"Johnson & Johnson must pay a $2.1 billion award to women who claimed its baby powder was contaminated with cancer-causing asbestos. The women also contended that J&J’s years of deceit about its product and disregard for the health of its customers warranted the punitive damage award."
"Experts are hoping the sight of vaccinated people enjoying life again in a relatively carefree manner will encourage unvaccinated people to get inoculated against COVID-19."
If you ever needed a reason to question the logic and reasoning of "The Experts," that should do it.
"In one of the latest lawsuits, 117 unvaccinated Texas hospital workers contend that their employer, The Methodist Hospital, is violating federal law and state public policy by firing workers over their refusal to take the vaccine, which still lacks full regulatory approval.
'The abbreviated timelines for the emergency use applications and authorizations means there is much the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not know about these products even as it authorizes them for emergency use, including their effectiveness against infection, death, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2…' the lawsuit states.
Similar concerns have been introduced in suits pending in California, North Carolina, New Mexico. Legal threats from workers in Wisconsin, and studentswhose universities are excluding unvaccinated individuals from their campuses."
"People seem to think that the end of lockdown is the end, but it's not...The vaccines are the way out of this. We need to establish this as part of normality,' he says.
COVID-19 vaccine available for kids 12 and older, but Texas health officials not requiring it for school
"The agency is authorized to set vaccine requirements for schools but will leave it up to state lawmakers to decide whether to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations, said Imelda Garcia, the department's associate commissioner of laboratory and infectious disease services.
'We typically follow the state Legislature's guidance on what vaccines to require for the back-to-school time frame, and at this point there is no intention of making it mandatory,' she told reporters."
From violating the Nuremberg Code by "using Nigerian children as human guinea pigs, without the childrens’ parents’ consent," to lying about the safety of their product to regulators resulting in consumer deaths, to racketeering, bribery, and more, take a look at the extensive rap sheet of the manufacturer of one of the current EUA vaccines.
While we are disappointed that our bill to abolish vaccine mandates did not make it out of committee (this time), we are cheering on Ohio's efforts right now!! This bill is currently in committee.
"House Bill 248, introduced last month by Rep. Jennifer Gross (R-West Chester), would allow anyone to decline any vaccine with a simple verbal declaration based on 'reasons of conscience.'
The bill would let people off the hook for vaccine requirements set by virtually any entity. The bill lists them, naming: individuals, businesses (like day cares), corporations, trusts, business trusts, estates, associations, partnerships, cities, counties, townships, municipal corporations, school districts, health districts, a city’s health board, any public official, public offices, or any state agency (defined as any institution or organization that receives any support from the state).
If any of the above entities even tries to institute a vaccine requirement, it would be required under HB 248 to notify people that they are able to decline. The entities are not allowed to disclose who has declined. And they 'shall not discriminate against, deny service or access to, segregate, require a facial covering or other vaccination status label for, or otherwise penalize an individual financially or socially for declining a vaccination.'”
Quotes above from: THIS ARTICLE
Why? Because the vaccines authorized for emergency use are DEFINITELY effective and you absolutely are immune, but the antibody tests authorized for emergency use are unreliable and we don't really know a lot about them since they haven't been around very long so we can't trust their results.
"'I definitely would not recommend it [getting antibody testing after being vaccinated],” he said. “For most people, if you’ve been vaccinated with an authorized vaccine, you’re going to have antibodies, and we understand what your protection would be.'"
"Since these tests were authorized for emergency use during the pandemic, Goodman said, 'We don’t have a tremendous amount of experience with them to know how they correlate with protection.'”
How to be a good citizen in three easy steps:
1. Only speak to approved experts
2. Do not question approved experts
3. Ignore real-world observations or experts that contradict approved experts
"'Unfortunately, there’s a lot of misinformation out there and just Googling vaccine, you’re going to get all sorts of stories on Facebook and so really try to talk to an expert,' said Dr. Marlene Millen, a professor of medicine and Chief Medical Information Officer for Ambulatory with UC San Diego Health."
IU will not require COVID-19 vaccine documentation from employees and staff, but it will offer incentives
"Indiana University will not require documentation that employees and students have received the COVID-19 vaccine by the fall semester. IU is still requiring everyone working or enrolled at any of its campuses be vaccinated.
The change in requiring documentation comes after state lawmakers and Indiana's attorney general said it violates a new state law banning immunization passports by the government."
Call Governor Abbott today and request that he sign SB 968 banning vaccine passports in Texas! Action Alert HERE!
Keep this foolishness out of Texas! Call Governor Abbott today and request that he sign SB 968 immediately to ban vaccine passports and protect Texas consumers from segregation and discrimination! See our Action Alert HERE
Why are we seeking Emergency Use Authorization to give an experimental vaccine to an age group not experiencing an emergency?
"But the risk that a child gets seriously ill is extremely small — comparable to the risk that children face of having serious illness as a result of the flu."
"About 117 staffers sued Houston Methodist Hospital Friday in Texas state court, claiming the facility’s vax-or-pink-slip mandate violates World War II-era ethics codes designed to prevent medical experimentation on unwilling human subjects. The so-called Nuremberg Code was developed in response to Nazi atrocities conducted on concentration camp victims."
FIGHT BACK. The world is watching:
“'CEOS of other health care institutions are calling nearly every day to ask how we are doing it,” Boom said in an April note to staffers. “I hope other health care systems and employers will quickly join Houston Methodist in making the vaccine mandatory for staff.'"
"'The number of these cases after vaccination with [the AstraZeneca vaccine] is statistically significantly higher than the number of cerebral venous thromboses that normally occur in the unvaccinated population,' the report states. 'All experts agreed unanimously that a pattern could be discerned here and that a connection between the reported above-mentioned diseases and the vaccination with Covid-19 vaccine AstraZeneca was not implausible,' it added."
This is exactly why informed consent, medical privacy, and vaccine choice MUST be protected.
"The company said people who get Covid shots at Walmart and Sam’s Club stores will be able to use free health passport apps to verify their vaccination records and then generate smartphone codes that could allow them to board a plane or enter a sports area."
What will YOU do if access to basic necessities is only granted for those with a "digital passport"?
"State health officials have placed the blame on highly contagious new variants now spreading in the state, as health experts caution national vaccination efforts are in a race against the contagious strains."
We were banned from Facebook for telling you this would happen. Why is it happening? Because vaccines that do not prevent infection or transmission drive viral mutations.
FB threatens to unpublished TFVC page
Anti-science Facebook “fact checkers” remove our post, thereby censoring established science and statements straight from Moderna's chief medical officer, Tal Zaks:
Concerning the vaccine's ability to prevent viral transmission, Zaks stated, "Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission.”(1) AND
“Hospitalisations and deaths from covid-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30,000 people,” he adds. “The same is true regarding whether it can save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out.” (2) AND
Concerning the issue of the evolution of more virulent strains due to the widespread use of a vaccine that prevents symptoms but not infection or transmission: "Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population... Immunity elicited by direct vaccination or by maternal vaccination prolongs host survival but does not prevent infection, viral replication or transmission, thus extending the infectious periods of strains otherwise too lethal to persist. Our data show that anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts." (3) AND
"When a virus such as the coronavirus infects someone, that person's immune system mounts a response. Viruses produce slight variations when they multiply, and if any of these variants can evade a person's immune response, those variants are more likely to survive and possibly to spread to other people... They [people who have received only one of two C-vaccines] might serve as a sort of a breeding ground for the virus to acquire new mutations," says Paul Bieniasz, a Howard Hughes investigator at the Rockefeller University. (4)
"Experts say people can still spread and even develop COVID-19 after getting a vaccine. They add the vaccine doesn’t prevent coronavirus infection. It helps protect against serious illnesses. Experts advise people who get vaccinated to continue wearing a mask, washing their hands, and maintaining proper physical distancing."
Can't prevent infection. Can't prevent transmission. Can't stop masking or social distancing.
This vaccine is effective at….what, exactly?
For more information on this vaccine, download and share our printable Fact Sheet!
"The woman began complaining about discomfort after receiving a dose of the Pfizer vaccine at around noon on Friday, said Dr. Michael Morris, director of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California’s vaccination program, in a statement. She lost consciousness as she was being treated by medical personnel. Paramedics began performing CPR on her, but she couldn’t be revived, Morris continued.
Officials say there were no signs or symptoms the woman had a severe allergic reaction to the vaccine. Her cause of death is still being determined."
Somehow, it's never the vaccine. If you'd prefer not to become a victim of coincidence, make sure you're with us in this fight to protect and advance informed consent, medical privacy, and vaccine choice: www.texansforvaccinechoice.com/join
"More than 35 million Americans have received Covid vaccines, but the much-touted system the government designed to monitor any dangerous reactions won’t be capable of analyzing safety data for weeks or months, according to numerous federal health officials.
They expect it to start analyzing vaccine safety data sometime soon — but likely not until after the Biden administration reaches its goal of vaccinating 100 million people.
'…the fact of the matter is we don’t have enough information and we’re desperately in need of post-market information and monitoring,' said a high-ranking F.D.A. official, who asked not to be named because he was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly."
Best way to ensure your COVID-19 vaccine sails through safety trials? Don’t give your “placebo” group an inert saline injection — give them a meningitis vaccine instead!
You know you’re doing stellar science when your exclusion criteria has to list those who have previously had an adverse reaction to your placebo. You know, that thing that’s not supposed to produce any kind of reaction. 🙄
Other interesting exclusion criteria: “Living in the same household as any vulnerable groups at risk of severe COVID-19 disease.” Couldn’t possibly be because there’s a risk of the vaccinated spreading coronavirus to everyone they come in contact with, right? #vaccinescience#safetyfirst
Nimenrix vaccine package insert (UK meningitis vaccine):
“‘Once you have the infection, it could remain dormant with minimal symptoms,’ New York University microbiology and pathology professor Philip Tierno Jr. told Reuters. ‘And then you can get an exacerbation if it finds its way into the lungs.’
For similar reasons, one of the doctors who told NPR they experienced a second positive coronavirus test after a recovery questioned China’s decision to not include asymptomatic carriers in its official case count. China is also not counting new cases found in people who previously had the virus in its official count, NPR noted.
‘I have no idea why the authorities choose not to count [asymptomatic] cases in the official case count. I am baffled,’ the doctor reportedly said.'”
“Now comes Fauci with this, as reported by Politico: ‘Coronavirus immunity cards for Americans are ‘being discussed.’
Immunity cards — already implemented in Germany; currently being discussed in the United Kingdom and Italy — are identification documents to prove vaccination. They’re quite popular, it seems, in communist China.
Show me your papers or stay quarantined! Is that the direction America’s headed?
‘I mean, it’s one of those things that we talk about when we want to make sure that we know who the vulnerable people are and not,’ Fauci said, Politico reported.
The vulnerable people? Fauci means those at risk from coronavirus. But the real vulnerable people here are free Americans. The real vulnerable are all the freedom-loving Americans watching with dismay as their free America is destroyed by the likes of unelected wonks — unelected, unaccountable to the people, and apparently, unconcerned at all with the God-given rights of constitutionally protected individuals.”
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo: “We want to use New York as a laboratory. We are ready, willing, in any way. Do you need a place to test it in large numbers?” he asked rhetorically of the feds. “Think of New York.”
“The governor offered up his constituents as lab rats as the contagion continued to level off in the Empire State, slowly and painfully.”
“Following Bill Gates’ proposal for ‘digital certificates’ proving a person has been vaccinated against the coronavirus, Attorney General William Barr said he was ‘very concerned about the slippery slope in terms of continuing encroachments on personal liberty.’
Barr added he was concerned about ‘the tracking of people and so forth, generally, especially going forward over a long period of time.'”
“The unexpected structural change “raises the alarm that the ongoing vaccine development may become futile in future epidemic if more mutations were identified,” the experts wrote in their paper published on biorxiv.org.
“Immunology lecturer Jenna Macciochi, who works for the University of Sussex, also said that current vaccine developments are not necessarily affected by the discovered mutation.”
Gates says that to use his vaccine to vaccinate the entire population, manufacturers will need indemnification to be protected from liability lawsuits:
“That decision lets go and give this vaccine to the entire world, government will have to be involved, because there will be some risk and indemnification needed, before that can be decided on.”
It’s so safe, he’s willing to bet YOUR life on it!
P.S. All of the vaccines currently on the CDC Childhood Vaccine Schedule enjoy this immunity from liability, so what do you think that means for us here in the US? It means you’re looking at your next addition to the childhood vaccine schedule!
“On March 11, one day after Business Insider reported how Gates had been pushing for a WHO declaration of pandemic on the coronavirus — one day after Gates announced the infusion of millions of dollars into a WHO-partnered venture called COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator, that dangled the prospect of putting more regulatory powers into the hands of the global elitists — one day after that, WHO’s director-general made an interesting announcement.
On March 11, at a press conference on the coronavirus, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said this: ‘We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic.’
Coincidence? Perhaps. But there’s a lot of money and power and influence to be made with this coincidence.”
To be clear: Bill Gates is not a doctor. He is not a scientist. Yet he influences world health policy?
“Over the past decade, the world’s richest man has become the World Health Organization’s second biggest donor, second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom.
The result, say his critics, is that Gates’ priorities have become the WHO’s. Rather than focusing on strengthening health care in poor countries — that would help, in their view, to contain future outbreaks like the Ebola epidemic — the agency spends a disproportionate amount of its resources on projects with the measurable outcomes Gates prefers…
Few people dare to openly criticize what he does. Most of 16 people interviewed on the topic would only do so on the condition of anonymity. But the foundation’s focus on delivering vaccines and medicines, rather than on building resilient health systems, has drawn criticism. And some NGOs worry it may be too close to industry.”
“The epicenter of COVID-19(Coronavirus ) is China, Italy, Spain, France, US. Clinical trials on its possible cure must start there and not in any African country. African leaders must resist any attempt to use our people as Guinea pigs. Resist,” [Bungoma Senator Moses Wetangu’la] tweeted.”
Sadly, exploitation of underdeveloped populations in the name of vaccine development is nothing new.
“Anthony Fauci has just warned what cooler-head coronavirus watchers have suspected all along: that this country may never, no never, go back to normal. Never, that is, Fauci suggested, until a vaccine is developed. And by logical extension, that’s to say — never, until a vaccine is developed that must then be included on the required list of shots for all children to attend school. What great news for Big Pharma.”
Two top French doctors said on live TV that coronavirus vaccines should be tested on poor Africans, leaving viewers horrified
“A discussion between two top French doctors on live TV left viewers horrified when they proposed that Africa should become a giant laboratory for coronavirus vaccine testing because the continent lacked the resources to defend against COVID-19.
One of them, Jean-Paul Mira, even compared Africans to prostitutes who were the focus of past AIDS studies. “We tried things on prostitutes because they are highly exposed and do not protect themselves,” he said.”
Appalled? You should be. You should probably also know human rights violations and exploitation of underdeveloped populations in the name of vaccine development are nothing new. #philosophicalexemption
“…a new unearthed paper published in 2005 and shared with CDC, found that ‘Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture.’
So, the question is, if the CDC and FDA have been aware of the efficacy of chloroquine in treating coronavirus since at least 2005, why hasn’t the FDA collaborated with other organizations and fast tracked the use of chroloroquine and its sister drug, hydroxychloroquine and save thousands of lives? And why hasn’t chloroquine been mass produced and made available sooner?”
We’ve got a pretty good guess: AGENDA.
“A renowned research professor in France has reported successful results from a new treatment for Covid-19, with early tests suggesting it can stop the virus from being contagious in just six days.
He said that the first Covid-19 patients he had treated with the drug chloroquine had seen a rapid and effective speeding up of their healing process, and a sharp decrease in the amount of time they remained contagious.”
“Perhaps health is more important than privacy and civil liberties. Obviously, you’d have absolutely no civil liberties, freedoms, or powers if you were deceased.
However, the surveillance measures now being imposed on national populations risk permanently altering how much privacy and freedom we have as individuals.
And at this early stage in the life of the coronavirus, it’s not clear or transparent that the health benefits they provide (as opposed to isolation and testing policies on their own) outweigh the price we’d have to pay in terms of civil liberties.”
To overcome COVID-19 vaccine funding challenges, this article advocates for the use of “challenge prizes” – where governments or foundations offer a cash prize for the development of a successful vaccine.
“The next natural target for a challenge prize is a safe vaccine that is effective in preventing COVID-19. Some of the specifics still need to be worked out—how safe is “safe,” how effective is “effective”—but those are the sorts of specifics that a prize committee can adjudicate.”
Don’t fret, y’all! In this scenario, the definition of safety for your COVID-19 vaccine could be determined by the prize committee!! Doesn’t that sound exciting??
“Implementing a coronavirus vaccine prize will also require a number of design choices. For example, to encourage dissemination, we suggest that payments be tied to the number of patients vaccinated—an approach that has succeeded in the case of the pneumococcal vaccine.”
And, look! The consumer wins again as mandates are encouraged in order for prize money to be collected. What could possibly go wrong?
“To be sure, containing COVID-19 and saving lives are the most immediate objectives, but they are not the only goals. An outbreak, one might say, is a terrible thing to waste.”
“…it can cost $1 billion to fund the research and development of a new vaccine, according to a 2018 study published in Lancet, a peer-reviewed medical journal. On top of which, after months of testing, there is a 94% chance of failure, according to the authors of the study. Because of this, vaccine manufacturers often accept federal funding which allows the government to have a say in terms of pricing it.
So far, the government has pledged $1 billion for coronavirus vaccine research, Azar said.”
“Outbreaks and national emergencies often create pressure to suspend rights, standards and/or normal rules of ethical conduct. OFTEN OUR DECISION TO DO SO SEEMS UNWISE IN RETROSPECT,” ~ Jonathan Kimmelman, director of McGill University’s biomedical ethics unit, wrote in an email to Stat News.
Despite the fact that “Prior animal studies of SARS vaccines showed seriously high mortality risk upon secondary exposure following vaccination,” fast-tracking of a COVID19 vaccine continues. Lessons to be learned from the disastrous fast-tracked Dengue Fever vaccine? https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2020/02/21/1994991/doj-indicts-garin-9-others-reckless-imprudence-resulting-homicide-over-dengvaxia
“When you accelerate that process and you start cutting short on the amount of time you have for safety and efficacy testing because you want to prevent a pandemic, there’s always the risk that you’re going to wind up causing disease.” – Dr. Ian Lipkin, director of the Center for Infection & Immunity at Columbia University
“In fact, that’s what happened more than four decades ago, when the U.S. was struck by the Swine Flu.
President Ford went on national television and called for a mass inoculation of every man, woman and child in the United States. More than 40 million Americans rushed to get the shot they thought would save their lives.
“Unfortunately, there were individuals that had reactions to this vaccine,” said Adalja. “One reaction in particular was called Guillain-Barre syndrome, which is an autoimmune neurologic syndrome which causes weakness in your limbs and it can sometimes kill people.”
The Swine flu outbreak of 1976 never materialized into a full-blown epidemic, but 33 people did die from the vaccine that was created to protect them from the virus.”
Multiple warnings and urgings for caution from all areas of science and medicine where this new coronavirus vaccine is concerned. Will anyone listen, or will this end up another tragic tale for the history books?